Stop syncing a second data store. Rivestack runs tuned pgvector on dedicated NVMe PostgreSQL — your embeddings, metadata, and relational data in one database, queried with joins, filters, and transactions. Flat pricing from $15/month instead of read/write unit metering. Migration help is free.
A dedicated vector store earns its keep at massive scale. Below that, it is mostly overhead.
With Pinecone, embeddings live in one service and the rows they describe in another — two systems to sync, two copies to pay for, and application code stitching them together. With pgvector, a vector is just a column: one source of truth, one query.
The pgvector guide →Pinecone metadata filtering is limited key-value matching. In Postgres, your similarity search is a WHERE clause away from joins, full-text search, date ranges, and access control — combined in one SQL query, inside one transaction.
PostgreSQL for AI →Pinecone bills by read units, write units, and stored vectors — costs that scale with traffic and are hard to predict. Rivestack is a flat price per node, from $15/month. Query as much as you like; the bill does not move.
Postgres vs vector databases →An honest comparison — different architectures for different scales.
| Rivestack | Pinecone | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Managed Postgres with tuned pgvector | Dedicated vector database service |
| Data model | Vectors as columns next to relational data | Vectors + metadata, separate from your DB |
| Query language | SQL — joins, filters, transactions | API calls with metadata filters |
| Pricing model | $15/mo flat · HA from $35/node | Usage-based (reads, writes, storage) |
| Index types | HNSW + IVFFlat (pgvector) | Proprietary serverless index |
| Hybrid search | Vector + full-text (pg_trgm, tsvector) in one query | Sparse-dense vectors |
| Data sync | None needed — one database | Your pipeline keeps two stores in sync |
| Scale ceiling | Tens of millions of vectors per node | Effectively unlimited (billions+) |
| Best fit | RAG and search where data already lives in SQL | Massive-scale pure vector workloads |
Pinecone is a strong product for what it is built for: pure vector workloads at very large scale. If you are running billions of vectors, use it. Rivestack is the focused choice when your vectors belong next to the relational data they describe — which is most RAG and search applications.
For most workloads it is an afternoon — and we help, free.
Vector count, dimensions, QPS, and your current Pinecone spend. We reply within ~48 hours with a plan recommendation, expected QPS and latency from our benchmarks, and a side-by-side cost comparison. If pgvector is not a fit for your scale, we say so in the same reply.
Fetch your vectors and metadata via the Pinecone API, create a table with a vector column, and bulk-load with COPY. We build the HNSW index and tune ef_search for your recall target. For most workloads this is an afternoon, and we will do it with you.
Your query path becomes a SELECT with an ORDER BY embedding <=> $1 — plus whatever joins and filters you always wished you had. Drop the sync pipeline; there is nothing left to keep consistent.
Want the full white-glove version? See the Switch offer — we plan and run the migration with you, or email rescue@rivestack.io with your vector count and dimensions for a free review.
One price per node. No read units, no write units, no per-vector storage fees.
Shared PostgreSQL with pgvector for development and testing.
Your own dedicated VM for small production apps. Never deleted.
Production dedicated PostgreSQL with HA-ready architecture.
More compute and storage for larger workloads.
High-performance dedicated PostgreSQL for demanding workloads.
What teams ask before consolidating their vector stack into Postgres.
The pattern we see: a team adopts Pinecone for vector search, then discovers the real cost — usage-based bills that grow with traffic, a second data store to keep in sync with their database, and filtering that cannot express what a SQL WHERE clause can. If your source data already lives in Postgres, moving the vectors there too removes a whole system from your architecture.
For most workloads, no. pgvector with an HNSW index on NVMe handles the typical RAG and semantic search scale — hundreds of thousands to tens of millions of vectors — with single-digit-millisecond latency, and we measure ~1,000 QPS at recall@10 0.93 on 250k × 1536-dimension vectors on a $35 node. What you gain is SQL: joins, transactions, full-text hybrid search, and one database to operate instead of two.
At very large scale — billions of vectors, or workloads that are purely vector search with no relational side. Pinecone is built for that and does it well. If that is you, stay. The honest dividing line: if your vectors describe rows that live in a SQL database, pgvector usually wins; if vectors are the whole product at massive scale, a dedicated vector database earns its cost.
Usually substantially, because the pricing models are different in kind: Pinecone meters reads, writes, and storage, so the bill grows with traffic; Rivestack is a flat price per node regardless of query volume. A $15 Solo or $35 Starter node covers what many teams pay Pinecone hundreds for. Send us your vector count, dimensions, and QPS and we will give you a realistic number.
Export vectors and metadata through the Pinecone API, bulk-load into a vector column with COPY, build an HNSW index, and tune ef_search to hit your recall target. Your query path changes from API calls to SQL. For most workloads it is an afternoon of work, and migration help is free — we will plan it with you and pair on the cutover.
Postgres does hybrid search natively: combine vector similarity with full-text (tsvector, pg_trgm) in a single query and rerank with SQL expressions — no sparse-dense vector gymnastics. Because it is all one planner, you can also pre-filter by joins and permissions before the vector scan, which dedicated vector stores struggle to do efficiently.
Your data is encrypted in transit and at rest, backed up daily to separate S3-compatible storage with point-in-time recovery, and HA clusters run Patroni-managed automatic failover. Everything is vanilla PostgreSQL — you can pg_dump your entire database, vectors included, and leave at any moment. No lock-in is the strongest guarantee we can offer, and one Pinecone cannot match.
Yes. The free tier gives you a Postgres database with pgvector in about a minute, no credit card. Load a sample of your vectors, run your real queries with your real filters, and measure recall and latency before you commit. Our live demo at ask.rivestack.io shows pgvector searching 40K chunks of Hacker News if you want to feel the latency first.
More on vectors in Postgres.
When pgvector replaces a dedicated vector store — and when it does not.
HNSW vs IVFFlat, tuning ef_search, and getting recall right.
We plan and run your migration with you, free, for the first 25 teams.
Comparing other providers? See the Supabase alternative and Neon alternative pages, or the full managed pgvector overview.